3 min read

Will Pyrolysis of Methane become a challenge for renewable electricity based Green Hydrogen concept?

Will Pyrolysis of Methane become a challenge for renewable electricity based Green Hydrogen concept?
Source: www.monolithmaterials.com

Source: BASF R&D program for Methane Pyrolysis

More info:


Certainly! Pyrolysis of methane is an emerging technology that offers an alternative route to hydrogen production. As the world seeks to transition to cleaner energy sources, the production of hydrogen from renewable electricity (often termed "green hydrogen") has gained significant attention. However, the potential of methane pyrolysis as a hydrogen production method could pose challenges and opportunities for the green hydrogen concept. Let's delve into a comprehensive review of this topic.

1. Introduction to Green Hydrogen and Methane Pyrolysis

Green Hydrogen: This refers to hydrogen produced using renewable energy sources, typically through the electrolysis of water. The process involves splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity generated from renewable sources like wind, solar, or hydropower.

Methane Pyrolysis: This is a process where methane (CH₄) is decomposed into hydrogen (H₂) and solid carbon (C) at high temperatures. Unlike steam methane reforming (SMR), which is currently the dominant method for hydrogen production, methane pyrolysis does not produce CO₂ as a byproduct.

2. Advantages of Methane Pyrolysis

  • No CO₂ Emissions: One of the primary benefits is that it produces hydrogen without emitting CO₂, making it a potentially environmentally friendly method.
  • Utilization of Natural Gas Reserves: Methane pyrolysis can leverage the vast reserves of natural gas available globally, providing a bridge between fossil fuels and a hydrogen economy.
  • Solid Carbon Byproduct: The solid carbon produced can have commercial value, especially if it's in the form of high-quality carbon black or graphite.

3. Challenges for Green Hydrogen Posed by Methane Pyrolysis

  • Economic Competitiveness: If methane pyrolysis becomes economically competitive, it might divert investments away from green hydrogen infrastructure, such as electrolyzers and renewable energy projects.
  • Infrastructure: Existing natural gas infrastructure can be repurposed or adapted for methane pyrolysis, potentially giving it a head start over green hydrogen in some regions.
  • Perception: If marketed effectively, methane pyrolysis could be perceived as a cleaner alternative to SMR, making it more palatable to stakeholders concerned about CO₂ emissions.

4. Challenges Faced by Methane Pyrolysis

  • Technological Maturity: Methane pyrolysis is still in the developmental phase, with several technical challenges to overcome, including reactor design, carbon removal, and process efficiency.
  • Source of Methane: While methane pyrolysis itself doesn't emit CO₂, the extraction and transportation of natural gas (a primary source of methane) can. This could offset some of the environmental benefits.
  • Market for Solid Carbon: The economic viability of methane pyrolysis hinges on finding a consistent and profitable market for the solid carbon byproduct.

5. The Future: Coexistence or Competition?

It's conceivable that both green hydrogen and hydrogen from methane pyrolysis could coexist, serving different markets or regions based on resource availability, infrastructure, and policy. For instance:

  • Regional Preferences: Areas with abundant renewable energy might favor green hydrogen, while those with vast natural gas reserves might lean towards methane pyrolysis.
  • Policy and Incentives: Governments could play a decisive role. If they prioritize zero-emission technologies, green hydrogen might have the edge. Conversely, if the focus is on reducing CO₂ emissions from existing fossil fuel resources, methane pyrolysis could gain traction.


While methane pyrolysis presents an intriguing alternative to green hydrogen, its impact on the broader hydrogen economy will depend on technological advancements, economic factors, policy decisions, and market dynamics. Both methods have their merits, and the path forward might involve a combination of multiple hydrogen production strategies to meet global demand and environmental goals.